(The Uniform Crime Reports is based on data from police departments, and is thus generally a less reliable measure of actual crime.) Naturally, there are possible sources of bias in victim reports. Indeed, the link in the quoted sentence from the article goes to a source that relies on such data.īecause the NCVS surveys a large group of people about their experiences with crime victimization, it is not based on what is reported to the police and what the police do with it. Justice Department Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that are based on that survey.
Still, the most reliable data, to my knowledge, is generally the National Crime Victimization Survey, and the U.S. Of course, it's always hard to measure what the actual crime rate is for any group (whether for purposes of claiming that the rates are similar or that they are different). the black-on-black crime rate is especially high.there seems to be little aggregate disparity between the rate at which blacks commit violent crimes (especially when one focuses on crimes where the victims say they reported the crimes to the police) and the rate at which blacks are arrested for crimes and.blacks appear to commit violent crimes at a substantially higher rate per capita than do whites.(Blacks and whites do seem to commit drug possession and drug distribution crimes at relatively similar rates, but in this post I focus on violent crimes.) As best we can tell, Yet I think this is not the reality, at least as to violent crimes of the sort that are usually labeled "black-on-black" when committed by black criminals against black victims. The reality is that Black-on-Black crime is a myth, and that Black and white people routinely commit crimes at similar rates, but Black people are overwhelmingly targeted for arrest.
An article by a criminal law professor Thursday in the Columbus Dispatch included this assertion:
0 kommentar(er)
